I just died laughing đ
from genfood@feddit.org to lotrmemes@midwest.social on 17 Jul 23:00
https://feddit.org/post/32799281
from genfood@feddit.org to lotrmemes@midwest.social on 17 Jul 23:00
https://feddit.org/post/32799281
cross-posted from: feddit.org/post/32799278
threaded - newest
Maybe two European Swallows could carry it by the husk.
a European Swallow? Surely not. An African Swallow, maybe.
Oh, sure sure, or perhaps an African swallow
Itâs not a question of where he grips it!
I mean⊠Totally valid question!
IMO, itâd almost certainly be a terrible idea because all the ring has to do is get to someone else. If they lose track of that chicken for a second, I bet itâd run itâs ass off and find some other creature/character thatâd be easier to influence than Frodo.
Remember: It is not the petite, easily overpowered nature of Hobbits that made them a good choice. It was their peaceful, carefree nature: They are WAY less temptable by the idea of power and control than others.
So⊠While the worst damage a chicken would be likely to do directly would be to peck out the eyes of Sam and Frodo while they slept, it would still be foolish to put the ring in control of anything more temptable or less driven to destroy the ring than Frodo.
Also⊠itâs proximity to the ring that matters, so Frodo would still be under the influence of the ring, unless that chickenâs leash was like five miles long.
The resistance of the Hobbits is true, but stronger still is the circumstances in which the ring came to your possession. Bilbo stumbled upon it, Frodo inherited it, Sam took it to keep it safe. All three resisted for a very long time. Only Frodo gave into the temptation while the ring was in his possession.
Meanwhile, Déagol found it on accident in the river. Smeagol coveted it as a birthday gift. When Déagol refused to give it, Smeagol killed Déagol for it.
And, afaik, that was because the Ring was at its most powerful - facing imminent destruction is when the Ring goes all in with the influence.
It wasnât because it was facing destruction, but because it was at the heart of itâs power source.
At the precipice in Mt Doom, nobody could resist the temptations of the Ring. Itâs why Gollum was necessary.
A theme in the books is doing good only because itâs the right thing to do, and another theme is evil often hurts itself trying to be selfish.
Frodo and Gandalf have that talk about Gollum, and Frodo says itâs a pity Bilbo didnât slay him when he had a chance (in the books, itâs before he leaves the Shire, in the movies, itâs in Moria):
Thatâs my favorite quote from Gandalf.
This is what I was thinking of, just wasnât sure. Thanks for the additional details, always appreciated :)
Origin story of Cuccos in Legend of Zelda.
<img alt="" src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rByfYpfS4BY/hqdefault.jpg">
Have you seen the boys and the Ved up sheep?
Vd UP CHICKEEEEEEN!
This was written by someone who doesnât know all that much about chickens. The only creature that would be worse to let carry the ring would be a maiar. Or a goose.
Ikr? My dark lord is a hen