That's such a Tom thing to do
from ickplant@lemmy.world to lotrmemes@midwest.social on 15 Mar 2024 18:41
https://lemmy.world/post/13159023
from ickplant@lemmy.world to lotrmemes@midwest.social on 15 Mar 2024 18:41
https://lemmy.world/post/13159023
threaded - newest
Do not badmouth my husbando
<img alt="" src="https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/e4b31139-8af7-4d71-b337-4b11d93272b3.jpeg">
I mean doesn’t gandalf say if they gave him the ring he’d just lose it?
This comment should be deleted soon
I saw the movies first. When I tell you I was shocked by tom bombadill I thought I had lost my mind or had a wrong version of the book. Maybe this was a prank. I had to google it to find out it was in fact reality
I read the books as a youngin’ I was so pissed that they left my favorite character out of the movies. So I kinda had the opposite experience from you.
I watched the movies first then read the books and was subsequently pissed when I realized what they left out lol.
I read the books first, and while there are plenty of omissions and outright changes from the source material that I disagree with, cutting Tom Bombadil is not one of them.
Bombadil was one of the most important pieces of world building in LOTR, and that’s not a joke. He’s clearly a being of great power. He holds absolute sovereignty over his domain, such that even the trees and the undead bend to his will. And there is absolutely no cogent information or backstory on him, whatsoever. At all. Bombadil is printed proof that Middle Earth has a lot more going on than is touched on in the story. If Bombadil is an unexplained Great Being then it stands to reason that there would be more, beyond Sauron and Sauruman and the characters we meet directly. Bombadil is a signpost pointing off-screen and saying “Hey, there’s more stuff over this way”.
He may be crazy, and silly, and poorly explained, but that’s all for a reason. Tom represents the “etc.” at the end of the list of beings in Middle Earth. He is an open end implying the existence of more like him.
Nice interpretation but he really was just a character from unrelated stories by Tolkien he liked so much he reused him in LOTR. He’s just a remnant of the initial version of the book which had a lot of elements later editions revised like Strider being a hobbit.
This comment should be deleted soon