Chat control
from rikviergever@lemmy.world to privacy@lemmy.ml on 22 May 07:44
https://lemmy.world/post/47196537

Pandora’s iPhone, by Stuart Carlson, 2016. Still spot-on in 2026:

A backdoor for the good guys simply does not exist. Once you build it, hackers walk through, authoritarian governments walk through, and the rest follows.

The UK is pressuring for chat control right now. EU Chat Control initiatives keep popping up. We need to keep saying NO to this!

Pandora's iPhone, by Stuart Carlson, 2016.

#privacy

threaded - newest

Domino@quokk.au on 22 May 08:29 next collapse

What’s the ETC or behind it? What else could be worse?

And why isn’t the FBI part of the repressive regimes man?

myrmidex@belgae.social on 22 May 08:39 next collapse

why isn’t the FBI part of the repressive regimes man?

Or the hackers

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 22 May 08:47 next collapse

the cia? oligarch pedophiles?

Klear@piefed.world on 22 May 09:12 next collapse

I guess the difference is that FBI makes Apple install the backdoors, while the rest of the bigger guys just reap the spoils afterwards.

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 10:44 collapse

It’s a respectable and necessary “intelligence agency” when we do it, nefarious and unjust spying when they do it. Same old propaganda.

MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip on 22 May 09:39 next collapse

Etc. could have been fraudsters and/or scammers.

geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml on 22 May 09:52 next collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/ce3087eb-a4f9-49c1-94c4-1647644472d4.png">

dropdrip@lemmy.ml on 22 May 10:22 next collapse

Build the alternative and use it.

You’re either the dictator of your computer or you’re not. A government ‘forcing’ companies to hand over logs describing what happened on their commercial platform means you have not even begun the fight. It’s a complete farce.

It’s a distraction from the fact all these companies are rolling in capital by manipulating their users–oh, but I want to be manipulated by daddy Apple or daddy Discord, just not daddy national-government. What?

It’s a fucking larp. How many of you will agitate against this, but you will still use your fucking Discord/Apple/Google/Meta whatever?

Oh, the government is going to hunt you down for using different software that is non-compliant with legislation? What? In what fantasy land? Wake me up when there’s boots on the ground invading people’s homes by authorities to check what software I’m running on my computer. It’s never going to happen.

EDIT: Sorry, the more I look at this cartoon the more this pisses me off. It’s painting Apple as an innocent. It’s fucking not. Come on, dear artist, labour more to paint mega-corp dictatorships as benign, aloof, white, middle-class targets. Get fuckt.

ruplicant@sh.itjust.works on 22 May 10:59 next collapse

Really great comment! I do not agree with the edit, tho. Apple’s dude is the one with they on his and, on an Apple device. Doesn’t look like Apple is depicted as an innocent agent here, to me

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 22 May 18:35 collapse

me and a lot of us on lemmy do whenever possible.

the problem comes from the societal changes that spawn off of that shit when most normies are using it and/or don’t care.

like how i can be super careful i don’t upload my picture, but then the first normie takes it and my face is suddenly on a database. or public surveillance camers etc.

or how facebook mindrot culture is now mainstream even if we don’t use it.

dropdrip@lemmy.ml on 22 May 20:16 collapse

You are absolutely correct, which is why this and even your comment is a distraction. Regardless of how much we dislike the sophisticated surveillance regime you can’t deny material reality: it exists.

The correct thing to do is to materially destroy it. Its current existence is the threat, not a theoretical oh, it might be compelled to do something to me. The actual fact it could do something to you now is the issue. It is doing things to you right now. Every user of these commercial entities labours freely for these trillion-dollar companies.

E.g.: A Google android phone provides data to Google which they use in their commercial mapping-software, which they sell access to. “Oh, but I get free-access to Google maps; if my mobile-computer spies on me to improve Google maps then it’s beneficial to be spied on.” Such reasoning is trotted out ceaselessly, but it ignores the commercial nature of Google: other companies (& governments) are required to pay a license to use it. You’re a rube labouring for free. You are an employee of Google, only you don’t realise it; neither does the law. You materially impoverish yourself whilst enriching a capitalist corporation. The data you’re giving away has value. Even if you want to deny that value consider the following: you pay for the hardware, the data connection and the electricity that enables the extraction of that data. !Socialise the losses privatise the profits! Free access to Google maps isn’t charitable. It’s a requirement to extract labour from you that improves Google maps. (EDIT 3: this is an important point that I wish to impress upon the reader: that improvement allows Google to demand higher prices from other commercial entities [& governments]. If the product stagnates then the price does too. To prevent this you are required to purchase increasingly sophisticated mobile-computers to extract increasingly sophisticated data sets.

Have any of you used commercial software recently? Consumer computers are fucking super-computers, yet Microsoft windows and Adobe’s PDF reader lags like a motherfucker dancing in molasses under the ocean in a pit of sand–just wtf!)

You might as well praise your employer for providing shelter whilst at work. How charitable of them. Gee golly, I sure am pleased my employer lets my use a building whilst I labour for the owners. Gee golly, they’re so charitable that they’re not demanding a rent. (Satire.)

I will reiterate: it exists now. Ask yourself what can you do now to weaken what it is you’re fighting. This cartoon distracts from the fact that Apple is a private surveillance-corporation. Don’t use Apple controlled computers. That is the correct line.

Yes, your data will be inadvertently collected by rubes, but this cartoon says nothing about that fact. This cartoon is just a distraction. It shouldn’t be applauded by those who want privacy. It should be critiqued for what it is: a distraction.

EDIT: Apple would love this cartoon. Apple do not want to share their power with any government. This cartoon creates social-pressure to ease governmental oversight of their private, for profit fiefdom. This cartoon only aids Apple. Critique this cartoon.

EDIT2: just look at the fucking cartoon: Apple’s mobile-computer is on the left, brightly light. It’s white like virgin snow. It’s painted as a good thing. Apple’s mobile-computer is a private prison. It’s anything but good.

FINAL EDIT: on the topic of Google maps. I was shocked to learn that a store’s manager refused to comply with Google’s terms for being listed on Google’s maps. The shock was not from their refusal, but the requirements Google were demanding. They wanted a video that showed how to access the store (located within a larger commercial building) and privileged information. This was dressed up as attestation that they were in fact an employee of the store and therefore the data was valid and correct. However the privileged information they wanted was absurd: passwords to store safes and company logins.

That was what I was told by the manager. For those who work within businesses do these requirements sound familiar? Is Google actually demanding such information as a requirement for new listings?

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 22 May 21:45 collapse

i wholeheartedly agree with you. my great question is how.

how the fuck we take computing back and convince a critical mass of people this is wrong as fuck? because it looks like we are barely able to resist.

dropdrip@lemmy.ml on 22 May 22:32 collapse

I would say liberate yourself first. Buy computers that can or already are liberated (that is to say computers running libre software). Once liberated you will understand how it is done and can then teach others how to do it too.

You should not be concerned about politics here. Already the people are rendered mute under Western democracies.

Even if you don’t think it’s folly to persuade others, what are you persuading them of? To use software that you yourself don’t use? Build it. Use it. Promote it. Can’t write software? Donate to the orgs that are writing libre software. Can’t run it? Haven’t you liberated your computer? If you have you can run it. Can’t promote it? Are you not able to communicate?

Ditch Apple and Google. Use GrapheneOS. Use a linux powered mobile-computer like Pine Phone. Use encrypted overlay networks to communicate over the internet like i2p (it has a Java implementation and a C++ implementation), tor, hyphanet or my personal favorite: GNUnet. Heck, use all of them!

I will preemptively address an infantile critique of GrapheneOS: it uses Google branded hardware. File off the logo if it disturbs you so much. This critique fails to address the reality: hardware is subsidized by technological behemoths like Google because their product is not the hardware, but the software that is built off data collected by the hardware. An argument could be made that taking advantage of that subsidization maliciously damages Google more than purchasing non-subsidized hardware. Something to think about. Regardless, Foxconn makes both Google Pixels and Apple Iphones. The branding blinds people of the reality.

Anyway… rambles, rambles. It’s not about convincing others, it’s about you doing what you think is the correct thing to do.

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 10:48 next collapse

“Authoritarian governments” as if the US is isn’t exactly fucking that

couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip on 22 May 10:51 next collapse

I think it’s more like a “protest the regime and have a 50+% chance of getting executed for it” thing

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 11:00 next collapse

And the odds of getting killed at a protest here are what, only 30%? Bullshit. It’s a propaganda thing, the US has always been a violent repressive menace to world peace.

couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip on 22 May 11:08 next collapse

I pray you understand I’m trying to create a picture that’s comprehensible for the average. ml user here

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 11:20 collapse

What you think/claim you’re doing doesn’t matter at all, this is presenting the US federal government as less of a threat to our privacy than some other “repressive regime” somewhere else in the world and that’s 100% bullshit

couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip on 22 May 12:21 collapse

Ah yes those people worried about getting executed for opposing their government face the same threat as someone in the US worried for their privacy

One struggle

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 12:31 next collapse

People in the US are summarily executed by law enforcement without consequence, pretty well documented actually

couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip on 22 May 14:23 collapse

Are they legally executing people protesting the government at a comparable rate to, say, Iran or Saudi Arabia?

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 14:57 collapse

Definitely higher than Iran, possibly lower than Saudi Arabia lol

couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip on 22 May 15:08 collapse

Iran is executing about 100 prisoners per month. How many do you have the US at?

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 15:37 collapse

“Of course Iran is worse than the US, this extremely well documented US propaganda operation told me so” <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/0c84db5b-bd9b-4694-b1b3-5b4e22acacff.jpeg">

RiverRock@lemmy.ml on 22 May 19:47 collapse

Black Panthers, BLM organizers, anti ICE protestors

couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip on 22 May 19:57 collapse

And how many of those are they executing /day?

RiverRock@lemmy.ml on 22 May 23:11 collapse

“Oh yeah well it’s not happening every day” dude it’s fine that there are groups of people in the US who fear execution by their government who you forgot about. Nobody remembers everyone all the time, but it’s weird to get argumentative and start moving goalposts about it.

LesserAbe@lemmy.world on 22 May 11:49 collapse

The odds of getting killed at a protest aren’t 30%. If that were true we would have hundreds of thousands dead each year.

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 12:30 next collapse

Based on what? Statistics provided by the same government we’re talking about?

LesserAbe@lemmy.world on 23 May 16:44 collapse

It’s a ridiculous claim. If it were 30%, even just off anecdotal data from social media, people you know at work, friends, you would hear about tons of people dying. I’ve been to numerous protests, I would have personally seen dozens to thousands of people dead.

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 23 May 18:20 collapse

And the 50% claim I’m responding to is no less ridiculous or baseless, the difference in how people respond to them is pure chauvinism

LesserAbe@lemmy.world on 24 May 01:50 collapse

You said, “And the odds of getting killed at a protest here are what, only 30%? Bullshit. It’s a propaganda thing, the US has always been a violent repressive menace to world peace.”

The U.S. has done many reprehensible things. But I’m talking about your specific claim that the odds of getting killed at a protest in the U.S. are 30%, which is false.

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 24 May 03:40 collapse

Learn to read dumbass

LesserAbe@lemmy.world on 24 May 13:38 collapse

“Public forum discussions aren’t just about persuading the person you’re interacting with directly, they’re about persuading every single person who reads that interaction for as long as it exists. The only reason not to try is because you suspect you’ll come out of it looking worse to observers, not just losing the argument with one person but inadvertently reinforcing their position to third parties and popularizing their views over your own.”

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 24 May 15:51 collapse

I already won dumbass

jaybone@lemmy.zip on 22 May 12:34 next collapse

Can argue with ml

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 23 May 18:24 collapse

Public forum discussions aren’t just about persuading the person you’re interacting with directly, they’re about persuading every single person who reads that interaction for as long as it exists. The only reason not to try is because you suspect you’ll come out of it looking worse to observers, not just losing the argument with one person but inadvertently reinforcing their position to third parties and popularizing their views over your own.

RiverRock@lemmy.ml on 22 May 17:12 collapse

Allow me to facetiously talk about the US the way people from this country typically talk about the DPRK:

How do we know they don’t kill hundreds of thousands of protestors a year? The repressive government regime hides any information that makes it look bad, such as job reports, climate reports, and war casualties. They’ve got concentration camps all over and people dissappear all the time. There’s just no way we can trust their numbers.

RiverRock@lemmy.ml on 22 May 19:46 collapse

Something which the good people at Radio Free Asia is totally real and definitely happens

Zerush@lemmy.ml on 22 May 12:29 collapse

Authoritarian? The US currently even outscored North Corea.

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 12:32 collapse

Outscored where? Based on what?

Zerush@lemmy.ml on 22 May 12:49 collapse

On repressive policy

kboy101222@sh.itjust.works on 22 May 13:19 next collapse

According to?..

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 13:28 collapse

I’m not saying I don’t believe the US has repressive policies, but I am questioning any source that claims to have detailed enough info about NK internal policy to accurately rank them compared to other countries

queermunist@lemmy.ml on 22 May 13:33 collapse

The thing is, being repressive becomes more and more expensive past a certain point. It’s not cheap being the prison capital of the world or building a surveillance state. The US is one of the only countries that can even afford to do as much repression as it does.

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 13:38 collapse

That’s why we use our prison population for slave labor, helps to offset the cost!

queermunist@lemmy.ml on 22 May 13:58 collapse

Maybe to some extent, but prison slavery only provides about $9 billion in services and produces over $2 billion in goods annually.

For comparison, the total cost of the U.S. prison system is approximately $445 billion annually.

frisbird@lemmy.ml on 22 May 14:31 next collapse

Sure, but that’s why we are the only country in the world to charge prisoners hundreds of dollars a day for the privilege of being in prison, on top of the price gouging for basic services.

Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 15:00 collapse

Absolutely correct! Tbf I did say it helps to offset the cost, not that it’s anywhere near profitable

Zerush@lemmy.ml on 22 May 10:49 next collapse

Apple seems too small and innocent in this image

hypnicjerk@piefed.social on 22 May 12:19 next collapse

my little trillion-dollar corporation can’t be this cute!

jaybone@lemmy.zip on 22 May 12:32 collapse

The door should say: Made in China, designed in the USA.

Zerush@lemmy.ml on 22 May 12:47 collapse

Yes, like the MAGA hats

LeTak@feddit.org on 22 May 11:11 next collapse

The problem is, that nearly no OS is perfect. Even grapheneOS and copperheadOS. If a three letter agency wants to get access to the systems running a privacy OS, they will somehow get it. Who should block the door to the devs home? They raid them, acquire the signing keys with their methods and deploy a backdoor in the next OTA update.

It is always about thread level and alternative options. If they get Apple, you move to Android, then to graphene, then to sailfishOS and whatever comes next. If you care about it. But the thing is…. Who cares? Privacy and security enthusiast, for sure. Freedom of the press people? Hopefully But these people don’t always know about that shit, and those are to protect.

carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 22 May 12:07 next collapse

that’s a good image to convey the message to people propagandized by the us, but yes, “fbi” and “repressive regimes” are one and the same here

your domestic government poses much more of a threat to your privacy than some foreign “repressive regime” far away

jaybone@lemmy.zip on 22 May 12:31 collapse

I took it as “repressive regime” to mean the administration itself, (not some foreign government), as in more normal times the fbi was a separate entity. And would even investigate the president for crimes. But given the current consolidation of power and that checks and balances have been compromised, I suppose the distinction is moot now.

mistermodal@lemmy.ml on 22 May 13:48 next collapse

This is fucking slop lmao

el_abuelo@programming.dev on 22 May 14:34 collapse

A famous Carlos cartoon from long before the adoption of AI?

Doubtful.

mistermodal@lemmy.ml on 22 May 18:29 collapse

I never said it was AI slop but that’s an etymologically interesting thing you’ve got going on there, if I was a scientist I’d look into it

ICastFist@programming.dev on 22 May 13:52 next collapse

My conspiracy mind sometimes thinks that Apple has said backdoor and has given the keys, but plays a pretend game with the govt as if they didn’t

JoMiran@lemmy.ml on 22 May 13:56 next collapse

As far as threats go, I would swap FBI and Hackers.

UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml on 22 May 14:10 next collapse

The world is so vast and complicated, you just cant comprehend what good things your representatives are trying to do for you with your simple, tired, working class, simple brain.

Its hard work running a government, not that you would ever know because youre not in the big club. That’s why good things are hard to accomplish.

Your government loves you so much its worked its butt off towards this common goal with other nation states across the world simultaneously. Why arent you grateful?

Now go on back to your increasingly more expensive apartment, you got to get a lot to do before you get to your shift at your 3rd part time job. Oh and the retirement age went up again. Youre welcome.

ZeroHora@lemmy.ml on 22 May 14:37 next collapse

Is really sad when a company is forced to install a backdoor like that, kill all their revenue, how they will sell all your data if the buyer can get it for free? Poor companies.

dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 22 May 14:43 next collapse

Oh shit not the ETC

youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world on 22 May 15:40 next collapse

The FBI and others have had the open back door to iPhones for years.

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 22 May 22:43 collapse

as per the snowden leaks!

they apparently need even more

RiverRock@lemmy.ml on 22 May 17:09 next collapse

Love the weird scale of threat depicted here.

-smol bean megacorporation

-regular bean fbi man

-Big Hacker, the big hacker lobbyist

-giant evil FOREIGNER with their evil UNIFORM and MEDALS

-ect, other guys, artist kind of blew his load drawing all those evil medals

Like the scale implies I should be most worried about the biggest guy, but I live in America. The feds are the biggest threat to me. You can tell this wasn’t drawn by a leftist because…well, almost everything, but mostly because of how normal they seem to think the FBI is, and how small a deal being spied on by them apparently is compared to being spied on by someone that doesn’t have the capacity to send a death squad to my apartment at any moment.

Hypocrite9554@lemmy.world on 22 May 18:42 next collapse

Yeah the choice of scale is very weird, why are hackers larger than the FBI? Also doesn’t really seem mutually exclusive

Rooster326@programming.dev on 22 May 20:02 collapse

Because whoever made this (naively) trusts their government

Rooster326@programming.dev on 22 May 18:45 next collapse

That’s only because the FBI guy and the Oppressive Regime guy have become the same guy

Thesilverpig@lemmy.ml on 22 May 20:14 collapse

Astronaut behind astronaut, Always have been

girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works on 22 May 22:09 collapse

Probably more of a “Corporate wants you to find the difference…” than the astronaut one.

NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone on 22 May 22:00 next collapse

Almost as though the cartoonist just drew a load of their stock characters and then added labels instead of putting thought into it.

RiverRock@lemmy.ml on 22 May 22:56 collapse

The content grind comes for all

HugeNerd@lemmy.ca on 23 May 17:00 collapse

I also love the idea that all these people are waiting, specifically, for YOUR phone. This is masterful propaganda. Only thing missing is Putin drawn with bat wings, bloody fangs, and black eyes, and Zelensky as an angel blocking Putin.

go_go_gadget@lemmy.world on 22 May 18:46 next collapse

Should be “scammers” not “hackers”.

Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works on 22 May 19:01 next collapse

This illustration is completely wrong.

The man representing hackers isn’t in a fur suit.

Bloefz@lemmy.world on 22 May 22:49 collapse

Furries never hurt anyone. We don’t bite hard 🤭🦊

roundup5381@sh.itjust.works on 22 May 21:52 next collapse

oh hey, its me, E T C

87Six@lemmy.zip on 22 May 22:14 next collapse

We’re already at the “ETC” guy

auzy1@lemmy.world on 22 May 22:19 next collapse

Apple only needs to push a dodgy software update to the phone… No need for a backdoor. All phones are registered with Apple so they know who to push to

musket528@sopuli.xyz on 22 May 22:28 next collapse

biggest lifestyle challenge is escaping the apple ecosystem

umbrella@lemmy.ml on 22 May 22:42 collapse

also google!

mlg@lemmy.world on 22 May 22:33 next collapse

The scale is backwards lol.

peoflor@lemmy.ml on 22 May 22:49 next collapse

“etc” it’s Israel

Kaligalis@lemmy.world on 22 May 23:12 next collapse

Always keep in mind that your own state is almost always the group of actors having the most power over you. They are the ones who can hurt you or just make you jump though an infinite amount of hoops without any fear of consequence.

Normal people really can just ignore everyone who is or comes after “Hackers”. Focus on your own government. That’s where the real risks are.

SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world on 23 May 17:33 next collapse

“If you don’t have anything to hide, why would you be against this?” – Americans

filcuk@lemmy.zip on 24 May 14:49 collapse

Agreed! Police will now be going through the streets daily. If they find your front door locked, you’re going on a list, because you’re clearly hiding something.

Zerush@lemmy.ml on 23 May 18:36 collapse

If you need a Chat use the anonymous securebit.chat, showing the middle finger to control initiatives. <img alt="" src="https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/25b5e777-c313-4df3-9409-d04ed2b78b09.png">

foxfell@lemmy.ml on 23 May 19:13 next collapse

Looks like a scam, no, thanks.

LiamTheBox@lemmy.ml on 23 May 19:23 collapse

I think reinventing SimpleX Chat is already a lost cause