Alternative search engines to Google (tuta.com)
from schizoidman@lemmy.zip to privacy@lemmy.ml on 13 Aug 02:19
https://lemmy.zip/post/69601123

#privacy

threaded - newest

eremophila@lemmy.zip on 13 Aug 04:41 next collapse

noai.duckduckgo.com

eremophila@lemmy.zip on 13 Aug 04:42 next collapse

Unless something has changed, that chart is incorrect. I stopped using startpage earlier this year when they announced the inclusion of ai.

voytrekk@sopuli.xyz on 13 Aug 06:16 collapse

Every single search provider mentioned includes AI as an option. Fortunately, they all gave an option to just turn it off. It’s annoying, but if they find that users want these AI summaries, they need to add them as an option to compete.

Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip on 13 Aug 08:12 next collapse

I wish more of them just had an option to highlight excerpts from pages or Wikipedia articles like google used to do exclusively. But I’m sure that harder to build :/

vandsjov@feddit.dk on 14 Aug 02:20 collapse

I think Google got tired of having to defend itself from lawsuits about Google copying and displaying the contents of web sites and not sending people to these web sites.

Hirom@beehaw.org on 13 Aug 09:50 next collapse

Do users actually want such AI summaries? Is there any good polling on this?

I mostly read about people being annoyed by companies pushing hard for AI, and trying to get rid of those unrequested summaries.

eremophila@lemmy.zip on 14 Aug 01:03 collapse

tuta seem to have missed the mark then, incorrect details and not including noai.duckduckgo

turning ai off is a valid (and welcome) choice, but most people don’t look at settings, the default is often ai on, and updates can also change them.

in Firefox browsers and its forks:

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/107e5778-06ef-4f60-87e2-f6a9a8c40cf6.avif">

but then in a different part of settings:

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/701380e2-cba6-48eb-903b-8d76ae72e9e6.avif">

the ai setting there was defaulted to on, even with ai supposedly completely turned off in the main ai section

So I would rather use a search engine (and browser) with the default that ai is trash.

LeTak@feddit.org on 13 Aug 06:32 next collapse

I liked startpage until it broke for my setup, it does not work well with proxy’s, VPN and AdBlock. DuckDuckGo is my go to engine. Maybe in the near future I will setup searx. Also , in Germany there is ecosia but it also broke because of my setup.

pixeldaemon@sh.itjust.works on 13 Aug 07:09 collapse

Searx is not the easy one. Many instances don’t work, and the working ones hardly show relevant results.

irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone on 13 Aug 09:19 next collapse

Self-hosted isn’t as unstable because you don’t end up getting blocked by throttling as often if you’re the only user. Public instances tend to get hammered by bots and LLMs these days. Just put it behind a reverse proxy with a login or a VPN to keep others out. I use keycloak SSO in Traefik on a VPS, but pangolin works well for my web apps in my home. That said, it requires setup and maintenance. But no tracking since you own the server.

But TBH no generalized search engines are really good these days. They all mostly all overrun either by monetization schemes and ads or have been manipulated by SEO, so rarely give good results. I’ve been exploring lots of alternatives, but not many are any good.

pixeldaemon@sh.itjust.works on 13 Aug 19:02 collapse

What do you mean no tracking since you own your own server? If you use it alone, there is a straightforward correlation between the requests from your searxng instance and you, the dude who hosts it. The idea of searxng is that requests of many people become mixed together through an instance

irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone on 18 Aug 23:09 collapse

Yes, but no identification to tie that to. Sure they know the things some individual happens to search for, but they don’t have my google login or advertising ID or Facebook token or any other tracking tokens to link those requests to my identity outside of that silo of the IP address, and that changes as it’s sent over an anonymizing proxy. It’s not perfect and if they really tried they could probably track it down, but it’s rare enough and enough obfuscation that I doubt they’d care enough to do it.

greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net on 13 Aug 14:11 next collapse

Yeah I have not enjoyed it

SuperZorro@discuss.tchncs.de on 13 Aug 16:51 collapse

It used to be amazing, but lately the providers seem to have started fighting it. It’s take a while to get it setup correctly, especially if you want not only US results.

ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world on 13 Aug 06:49 next collapse

Mojeek ?

AuroraSine@lemmy.ml on 13 Aug 19:15 collapse

🖐🏻I using Mojeek.

aim4harmony@lemmy.world on 13 Aug 07:44 next collapse

xprivo?Based in Luxie.

Obcy@lemmy.zip on 13 Aug 08:50 next collapse

I sometimes use that Marginalia search.

zo0@programming.dev on 13 Aug 09:41 next collapse

Abandon search engines, normalize asking your cousins your questions again

dan1101@lemmy.world on 13 Aug 12:13 next collapse

Library help desk

lemmylump@lemmy.world on 13 Aug 15:00 next collapse

This is how everyone learned games like The Floor is Lava

eremophila@lemmy.zip on 14 Aug 00:55 collapse

complicated for usa people though

sunth1ef@sh.itjust.works on 13 Aug 15:43 next collapse

Honestly, Kagi is crushing it. Their search results are so quality that family members of mine have agreed it is better than google. I never thought I’d pay for search but now am honestly glad I do.

zksailor@lemmy.world on 13 Aug 17:33 next collapse

Ecosia all the way, search plus the right mission

vandsjov@feddit.dk on 13 Aug 21:12 collapse

Also building an independent search index together with Qwant - already serving the French and German users. In their way to to drop Google and Bing

Amaterasu@lemmy.world on 13 Aug 19:17 next collapse

What do you use to replace the Google’s Image search?

That is the area that I found more challenge.

heartSagan5@lemmy.zip on 13 Aug 23:43 collapse

Tineye, lenso.ai, picfinder? I’ve heard maybe Bing is better than Google now, but I don’t know.

rustbuckett@programming.dev on 13 Aug 20:04 next collapse

I’ve used DDG for years and really like it. I like it even more now that I’ve been using #emacs more because they have a text-based, or at least non-js, search page that works well in eww.

SoulKaribou@lemmy.ml on 14 Aug 12:09 collapse

Also appreciate the Lite/HTML approach of ddg for quick searches on the phone. Much faster and lean.

Qwant used to have one too but it’s been scrapped somehow

Cheebus@lemmy.world on 13 Aug 20:06 next collapse

Been paying for Kagi, i’m enjoying it

arinbasu@lemmy.ml on 14 Aug 01:09 collapse

Kagi is really good, particularly with Kagi assistant. Worth the money

Scrollone@feddit.it on 13 Aug 20:53 next collapse

I’ve been using Qwant and it’s really good, I think it’s better than DDG, at least for results in Italian

idriss@lemmy.ml on 14 Aug 00:39 next collapse

Brave search was surprisingly good, like google when it wasn’t shit.

W3dd1e@lemmy.zip on 14 Aug 01:45 collapse

I could never trust Brave. You can’t be a search or browser company and also run an ad network. It’s a conflict of interest.

Zoma@sh.itjust.works on 16 Aug 02:36 collapse

Was using 4get for a while but the instance seems to be broken, gonna try ecosia out for a while.