Historic Chat Control Vote in the EU Parliament: MEPs Vote to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats (www.patrick-breyer.de)
from Babalugats@feddit.uk to privacy@lemmy.ml on 13 Mar 21:07
https://feddit.uk/post/45797987

Cross posted from: feddit.uk/post/45797826

In a sensational turn of events in the fight against Chat Control, a majority in the European Parliament voted today to end the untargeted mass scanning of private communications. In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years. Pressure is now mounting on EU governments to respect the MEPs’ vote and bury untargeted mass surveillance in Europe once and for all.

Amendment 5, tabled by Pirate Party MEP Markéta Gregorová (Greens/EFA group) and adopted by a narrow margin, demands that any scanning of private communications must be strictly limited to individual users or groups of users suspected by a competent judicial authority of being linked to child sexual abuse. This aligns with the European Parliament’s 2023 mandate on the permanent Chat Control regulation (CSAR).

Based on today’s mandate, trilogue negotiations between the EU Parliament, the European Commission, and the Council of the EU are set to begin as early as tomorrow. Negotiations are taking place under extreme time pressure, as the current interim regulation authorizing Chat Control expires on April 6. The EU Commission and the vast majority of the EU Council—except for Italy—have so far categorically rejected any restrictions on untargeted mass scanning.

Digital freedom fighter Patrick Breyer (Pirate Party) commented on the historic vote:

“Today is a sensational victory for the countless citizens who made calls and sent emails to save their digital privacy of correspondence. Digital privacy is alive! Just as with our physical mail, the warrantless screening of our digital communications must remain taboo. EU governments must finally realize that true child protection requires secure apps (‘Security by Design’), the removal of illegal material at the source, and targeted investigations against suspects with a judicial warrant—not overreaching, pointless mass surveillance.”

The Hard Facts: Why Chat Control has failed spectacularly

Continue reading here - patrick-breyer.de/…/historic-chat-control-vote-in…

#privacy

threaded - newest

RandomDude@lemmy.ca on 13 Mar 21:17 next collapse

I’m sure they will be back… will take the w tho.

anon5621@lemmy.ml on 14 Mar 10:07 collapse

Meanwhile we have ProtectEU it almost same shit under different name

unknowablenight@piefed.social on 13 Mar 21:23 next collapse

WOO! This is proof that we actually have power! I am so relieved to see that democracy still exists here!

Bloefz@lemmy.world on 15 Mar 03:20 collapse

I wish I were as optimistic as you.

myszka@lemmy.ml on 13 Mar 23:43 next collapse

Did they actually decide against mass scanning for good or are they just going to rebrand it again? I’m confused

Bloefz@lemmy.world on 15 Mar 03:20 collapse

One of two things as I see it. They’ll either slightly rephrase/rebrand like they did before, or they’ll just grab hold of some incident (terrorism or child related), claim “this changes everything” and just force a new vote on the topic.

NarrativeBear@lemmy.world on 14 Mar 02:50 next collapse

Thank fucking god, someone finally realized opening everyone’s private messages would be similar to opening everyone’s written leters at the post office before they get sent.

Also people need to continue to stay vigilant, in case this does come back “rebrand” as something new.

fierysparrow89@lemmy.world on 14 Mar 14:22 next collapse

Great news for the EU! But don’t anybody think this is it. There are powerful interests behind mass surveilance. And selling more ads is just one of the least malevolent. These interests are probably not done trying to earn a € or $ more.

Babalugats@feddit.uk on 14 Mar 20:41 collapse

This is definitely not it, some corrupt politician will start it all again under a different guise after some unfettered lobbying by meta and the like. But great for the here and now to know that the public sway can at least once beat the heavy lobbying…

promitheas@programming.dev on 14 Mar 21:04 collapse

Alright everyone, good result. See you all here in a couple years for the new iteration

Bloefz@lemmy.world on 15 Mar 03:16 collapse

I’m sure it will be a lot sooner than that.

Patrick Breyer is right to claim a win but he’s celebrating too much IMO. They’ll keep coming and I’m sure he knows it.