Man accidentally gains control of 7,000 robot vacuums (www.popsci.com)
from AbaixoDeCao@lemmy.ca to privacy@lemmy.ml on 22 Feb 19:24
https://lemmy.ca/post/60825217

#privacy

threaded - newest

redbrick@lemmy.world on 22 Feb 19:55 next collapse

Gosh, their drones are getting banned in the US. This just seems to help their case.

Dave@lemmy.nz on 22 Feb 20:24 next collapse

I guess the most plausible explanation is incompetence, there wouldn’t be a reason to do this on purpose (a backdoor), right? Since the company could have easily used different credentials per device that they store anyway?

DrunkenPirate@feddit.org on 22 Feb 20:34 collapse

I would rather say ignorance. They just shit on IT-security for the sake of fast product launches.

A slightly similar event happened to Pudu service robots last year August. An auth token that could be used for all their robots.

[deleted] on 22 Feb 20:30 next collapse

.

SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 22 Feb 20:30 next collapse

The backend security bug effectively exposed an army of internet-connected robots that, in the wrong hands, could have turned into surveillance tools, all without their owners ever knowing.

Suprise, if it has cameras, microphones, gps, data mapping capabilities and speaks to a server outside of your home it is by definition is a surveillance tool.

All of this has always been predicated on the idea that the surveillance will never be used against you somehow. I don’t know why anyone ever bought into that.

FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works on 22 Feb 21:33 next collapse

if it has cameras, microphones, gps, data mapping capabilities and speaks to a server outside of your home

It has also happened with baby monitors. Well, almost endless other IoT devices too. But baby monitors are a particular issue. They have speakers in them too. Attackers were exploiting it and playing very disturbing sounds to cause extreme distress to babies.

msage@programming.dev on 23 Feb 08:29 collapse

Remember, the S in IoT stands for security.

Broken@lemmy.ml on 22 Feb 21:56 collapse

Which is why we need to de-normalize this thought process. People should always ask, why does my vacuum need to go online? Or at the very least, can I turn that “feature” off?

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 23 Feb 18:39 collapse

because vacuum makers lock away advanced capabilities on the app making a home network the only way you can access them.

of course, when you’re shopping, it’ll use those advanced features as advertisements; but there’s no way to know that ahead of time unless you’re buying the most expensive models available.

Broken@lemmy.ml on 24 Feb 11:05 collapse

And to top that off, those features have a terms contract you need to accept to use. Yet you don’t know what that entails until you spend a lot of money.

Both your point and this also needs to be denormalized. We should be able to have full visibility for purchase decisions and have no push back on returns if we don’t.

Ghostie@lemmy.zip on 23 Feb 01:26 next collapse

That really sucks.

Ephemeral@feddit.org on 23 Feb 08:10 next collapse

For those with a robot vacuum you might want to look into Valetudo. Or just not connect it to the internet.

besmtt@lemmy.world on 23 Feb 18:27 collapse

valetudo.cloud

TunaLobster@lemmy.world on 24 Feb 11:33 collapse

Also this project for Neatos. github.com/Philip2809/neato-connected

besmtt@lemmy.world on 25 Feb 00:08 collapse