How do you host your DNS sinkhole/resolver?
from ohshit604@sh.itjust.works to selfhosted@lemmy.world on 12 Mar 17:30
https://sh.itjust.works/post/34301218

Currently have nice long docker compose file that hosts my PiHole V6 container (along with a bunch of other containers) however, reason i ask this question is because whenever I go to pull an updated image and recreate the container I experience about 20 minutes of no DNS resolution which to my knowledge is due to the NTP clock being out of sync.

What’s the best way to host a DNS sinkhole/resolver that can mitigate this issue?

Was thinking of utilizing Proxmox & LXC but I suspect I’ll get the same experience.


Update: Turns out PiHole doesn’t support two instances, I got both of them on separate devices also set the 2nd DNS server in my routers WAN & LAN DNS settings which did in fact split DNS between both instances however, I lost access to my routers web-ui, my Traefik instance & reverse proxies died and I lost all internet access.

So, don’t do what I did.

Update 2: So everything I said in my first update let’s disregard that, turns out I had my router forcing all DNS to PiHole server 1 which caused my issues mentioned above.

Two servers appears to work!

#selfhosted

threaded - newest

mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud on 12 Mar 17:38 next collapse

If you run a single DNS server, you will always have downtime when it’s restarted.

The only way to mitigate that, is to run 2 DNS servers.

I setup my network to use pihole as the first DNS and the router as the second, most of the time pihole is used. Unless it’s down

tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden on 12 Mar 18:00 next collapse

How do you set up clients so they will always use the first one? I thought if a client knows 2 servers they will switch between them.

I plan to add a second Pihole at some point and keep them synced

atzanteol@sh.itjust.works on 12 Mar 18:12 next collapse

Yeah, you can’t. There is no guarantee that clients will use dns servers in any particular order.

Morphit@feddit.uk on 13 Mar 20:59 collapse

Not that it particularly matters for just queries. The problem is that DHCP can only be enabled on one host. If that one fails then devices can’t get on to the network themselves. I’d like to know a good way to have a failover DHCP server - my janky cronjob isn’t great.

DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org on 14 Mar 14:11 collapse

You can just run two DHCP servers. Give them non-overlapping ranges or give them the same MAC to IP mapping.

Morphit@feddit.uk on 14 Mar 14:28 collapse

How do the DNS servers resolve local hostnames then? The pihole DHCP integration adds local hostnames to DNS when they are assigned an address. If there’s two DHCP servers handing out leases, presumable only one would be accepted, how then would the DNS servers sync those names?

I think I had my secondary pihole resolve local names from the primary, and leases were copied over on a cronjob in case the secondary DHCP server had to be enabled.

DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org on 14 Mar 14:33 collapse

Use the second option of a static MAC to IP map and add the relevant records to each pihole’s local DNS.

themachine@lemmy.world on 12 Mar 18:22 next collapse

Are you using pihole to also create custom local DNS records?

tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden on 12 Mar 19:39 collapse

Yes, mostly just the hostnames

natch@lemmy.today on 12 Mar 18:21 next collapse

Just be sure that the second server in the list is also a black hole. If you don’t, all black holed requests will fallback to the second DNS… which, if it doesn’t also black hole them, will wind up serving you ads and defeating the point!

Personally I find a single Pi is just fine for DNS. It only takes like 10 seconds to reboot. Less, if you use M.2 storage via a HAT or boot from USB! That’s pretty fine downtime. But if you’re afraid you’ll knock over the network and get yelled at by your family or housemates, best to use a backup :)

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip on 13 Mar 19:44 collapse

Why wouldn’t you just use DNS on your router

DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org on 14 Mar 14:13 collapse

Router may not have a function you want.

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip on 14 Mar 15:46 collapse

Instead of paying for a raspberry Pi you could just get a OpenWRT device. You can get the router equivalent of a rust bucket since chances are you are not using the Wireless portion anyway.

DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org on 14 Mar 23:01 collapse

Sure, OpenWRT is good and there’s an Adguard Home plugin for it. You don’t need to buy any hardware to use Pihole though, many people run it in a container on an existing machine. So it comes down to the functionality you need or want and the software you prefer, right?

Lantier@jlai.lu on 12 Mar 17:43 next collapse

For a critical service like DNS, I decided to set it up bare metal on a Raspberry Pi 2 (even a Pi Zero should work). It’s been working fine for years, I just update it from time to time. That way I can mess with my homelab without worrying about DNS issues.

natch@lemmy.today on 12 Mar 18:22 collapse

Funny enough, the Pi Zero uses the CPU from the 3 and the Zero 2 uses the CPU from the 3+, so they’re both more powerful than a 2 anyway :)

486@lemmy.world on 12 Mar 20:04 collapse

Pi Zero uses the CPU from the 3

No, the original Pi Zero uses the CPU of the Pi1 (only clocked higher). So it is quite a bit slower than a Pi 2, since it has only a single ARMv6 CPU core. Still fine for a DNS server on a typical home network.

natch@lemmy.today on 14 Mar 18:41 collapse

Aha, thank you. Shouldn’t have riffed from memory on that one, I suppose!

But very much agreed: the Zero series has plenty of beef for a DNS server. Maybe when the 3 comes out I’ll add one as a backup for my 4 server.

Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu on 12 Mar 19:47 next collapse

Running unbound on my opnSense with the appropriate blacklists for ad filtering.

dmtalon@infosec.pub on 12 Mar 19:54 next collapse

spin up a second pihole docker and upgrade them separately so they can failover to the other one while upgrading. I do not have an issue with 20min lose of DNS after updating my pi.hole docker, but I did spin up a second one when I wanted to try unbound+pi.hole and just kept them both up/running.

ohshit604@sh.itjust.works on 12 Mar 23:07 collapse

spin up a second pihole docker and upgrade them separately so they can failover to the other one while upgrading.

Think I’m going to take this advice and put it in action! Thank you!

johntash@eviltoast.org on 12 Mar 19:58 next collapse

I think something else may be wrong if it breaks for 20 minutes. How long does it take for compose to bring the stack up?

Also assuming you run ntpd or chrony, it should always keep your clock in sync.

ohshit604@sh.itjust.works on 12 Mar 23:06 collapse

I think something else may be wrong if it breaks for 20 minutes.

When I originally setup my PiHole many, many, many months ago when I was still learning the Docker engine I had little to no issue.

I don’t know what caused it either being a power-outage or network loss but ever since I’ve been experiencing DNS related issues (I suspect it’s NTP not syncing), some days I’ll wake up before work realizing “oh shit I have no internet access” frantically trying to fix the issue.

I think i might take the advice of other commenters here and host two PiHole servers on separate devices/stacks, just got to hope my router supports it.

bigDottee@geekroom.tech on 12 Mar 20:02 next collapse

I am running AdGuard Home DNS, not PiHole… but same idea. I have AGH running in two LXCs on proxmox (containers). I have all DHCP zones configured to point to both instances, and I never reboot both at the same time. Additionally, I watch the status of the service to make sure it’s running before I reboot the other instance.

Outside of that, there’s really no other approach.

You would still need at least 2 DNS servers, but you could setup some sort of virtual IP or load balancing IP and configure DHCP to point to that IP, so when one instance goes down then it fails over to the other instance.

Hexarei@programming.dev on 12 Mar 20:57 next collapse

I run my pi-hole on a dedicated Pi, and I pull the updated image first without any trouble. Then after the updated image is pulled, recreating the container only takes a few seconds.

Dunno what’s broken about your setup, but it definitely sounds like something unusual to me.

pezhore@infosec.pub on 12 Mar 23:02 next collapse

This is overkill.

I have a dedicated raspberry pi for pihole, then two VMs running PowerDNS in Master/Slave mode. The PDNS servers use the Pihole as their primary recursive lookup, followed by some other Internet privacy DNS server that I can’t recall right now.

If I need to do maintenance on the pihole, power DNS can fall back to the internet DNS server. If I need to do updates on the PowerDNS cluster, I can do it one at a time to reduce the outage window.

EDIT: I should have phrased the first sentence: “My setup is overkill” rather than “This is overkill” - the Op is asking a very valid question and the passive phrasing of my post’s first sentence could be taken multiple ways.

AtariDump@lemmy.world on 13 Mar 00:59 collapse

When it comes to a “secondary”DNS… [there is nothing like a primary and secondary DNS server. These indications are quite misleading but many systems adopted it this way. Pihole only list the DNS servers as primary and secondary, because this is what the providers write on their pages. The bad phrasing is supported especially by how Windows handles it.](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/primary-vs-secondary-dns/1536/2)

[Most operating systems implement DNS servers as alternatives, not as fallbacks, i.e. they will query any of both servers from time to time, so it is quite likely that you will loose your Pi-hole filtering capabilities (at least partially) [if you specify a secondary DNS server on your network].](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/secondary-dns-server-for-dhcp/1874)

The **ONLY** DNS server you should have set on your network is a/the PiHole(s).

pezhore@infosec.pub on 13 Mar 01:24 collapse

Sorry, I wasn’t clear - I use PowerDNS so that I can more easily deploy services that can be resolved by my internal networks (deployed via Kubernetes or Terraform). In my case, the secondary PowerDNS server does regular zone transfers from the primary in order to ensure it has a copy of all A, PTR, CNAME, etc records.

But PowerDNS (and all DNS servers really), can either be authoritative resolvers or recursors. In my case, the PDNS servers are authoritative for my homelab zone/domain and they perform recursive lookups (with caching) for non-authoritative domains like google.com, infosec.pub, etc. By pointing my PDNS servers to PiHole for recursive lookups, I ensure that I have ad blocking while still allowing for my automation to handle the homelab records.

curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 13 Mar 04:39 next collapse

Two lxc’s, one pi 3b.

Jjoiq@lemmy.world on 13 Mar 19:28 next collapse

2 pihole instances 1 pi5 1 pi4 Keepalived provides vrrp at a set address.

Instances kept in sync via orbital

1 goes down the other takes over.

Quite elegantly.

Morphit@feddit.uk on 13 Mar 20:52 collapse

Where do you do DHCP? I had a primary pihole with DHCP enabled and a secondary with a cron job that enabled DHCP if the primary was down or disabled it if the primary was working. The cron job did sync DHCP leases from one to the other but it was a bit janky. I tried to update the secondary to pihole v6 and hosed it so I have no backup for now. I’d like to re-image the secondary and get a better setup - when I have time.

Edit to say I really wanted to try keepalived - that’s really cool to fail over without clients noticing.

Jjoiq@lemmy.world on 14 Mar 14:52 next collapse

On the router.

My router is locked down so i assign the vrrp address to wach client (pain in the ass) but it works.

Pivpn takes care or wireguard too.

Jjoiq@lemmy.world on 14 Mar 17:38 collapse

Debian & ubuntu sudo apt install keepalived

sudo apt install libipset13

Configuration

Find your IP

ip a

edit your config

sudo nano /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf

First node

vrrp_instance VI_1 {

state MASTER

interface ens18

virtual_router_id 55

priority 150

advert_int 1

unicast_src_ip 192.168.30.31

unicast_peer {

192.168.30.32

}

authentication {

auth_type PASS

auth_pass C3P9K9gc

}

virtual_ipaddress {

192.168.30.100/24

}

}

Second node

vrrp_instance VI_1 {

state BACKUP

interface ens18

virtual_router_id 55

priority 100

advert_int 1

unicast_src_ip 192.168.30.32

unicast_peer {

192.168.30.31

}

authentication {

auth_type PASS

auth_pass C3P9K9gc

}

virtual_ipaddress {

192.168.30.100/24

}

}

Start and enable the service

sudo systemctl enable --now keepalived.service

stopping the service

sudo systemctl stop keepalived.service

get the status

sudo systemctl status keepalived.service

Make sure to change ip and auth pass.

Enjoy

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip on 13 Mar 19:40 next collapse

I would do a single instance of Pihole. If you need HA there are ways to do that. If you need something more switch to a proper DNS service.

MMAniacle@lemm.ee on 14 Mar 01:21 next collapse

I run 2 separate adguard home containers on separate hosts and set DNS for both IPs. If I take one down, requests just get sent to the other.

AdguardHome-Sync works great for keeping them in sync

higgsboson@dubvee.org on 14 Mar 13:03 next collapse

I run Pihole+Unbound, Debian baremetal on a tinypc. RPi was too unreliable. I was too often dealing with issues.

My router is the failback, as it has blocking too.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 14 Mar 14:29 next collapse

I’m looking into Technitium, which doesn’t get a ton of attention here. It looks to be much more feature packed than PiHole (DNS over HTTPS, for example), and similar to AdGuard Home.

ikidd@lemmy.world on 14 Mar 14:56 collapse

Man, I was excited about Technitium, but I’ve had a hell of a time trying to get it to work. I’m not sure if it’s intended to be on a DMZ in order to get TLS working or something, but I’ve not been able to get it to acknowledge a single DNS request, even when I think I’ve shut down DNSSec entirely.

ookiiBoy@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 14 Mar 15:24 next collapse

How do you host your DNS sinkhole/resolver?

Like this, baby:

services.adguardhome = {
      enable = true;
      mutableSettings = false;
      openFirewall = true;
      settings = {
        dns = {
          # Web Interface
          bootstrap_dns = ["9.9.9.9" "149.112.112.112"];
          upstream_dns = ["https://dns.quad9.net/dns-query"];
          fallback_dns = ["tls://dns.quad9.net"];
        };
        filters = [
          {
            name = "AdGuard DNS filter";
            url = "https://adguardteam.github.io/HostlistsRegistry/assets/filter_1.txt";
            enabled = true;
          }
        ];
        filtering = {
          blocked_services = {
            ids = [
            ];
          };
          protection_enabled = true;
          filtering_enabled = true;
          rewrites = [
          ];
        };

Deploy to the main home server, and the backup instance. NixOS is fucking awesome. No sync tool needed.

Lem453@lemmy.ca on 14 Mar 19:06 collapse

How do I use nixos for docker? I’ve tried before but what I want is to be able to pull docker compose from a git and deploy it. I haven’t been able to find an easy way to do that on docker

ookiiBoy@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 15 Mar 04:17 next collapse

Most of the time you don’t need docker. NixOS isolates runtimes.

That being said, you could use nix to build the docker container, and then run it using the built-in oci-container options.

Morphit@feddit.uk on 15 Mar 13:55 collapse

If you have the docker-compose.yml locally, you can nix run github:aksiksi/compose2nix to translate it into a nix file for inclusion in your nixos system config. I think that could be done in the config itself with a git url but I’m not that great at nix. You will surely still need some manual config to e.g. set environment variables for paths and secrets.

HRYDJPCHNMNDGBLTFIYA@lemm.ee on 14 Mar 16:24 collapse

I don’t rely on it, but for guests etc I use adblock on OpenWrt with oisd.nl. It’s supposed to have no false positives