Hivekeep - self-host a team of AI agents in one container, with a real UI (MIT) (github.com)
from MarlburroW@lemmy.world to selfhosted@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 11:48
https://lemmy.world/post/48404439

I’ve been running self-hosted AI agents for a while. Tools like OpenClaw and Hermes do this well and were a big inspiration, but they’re CLI/dev-first and headless. I wanted that kind of power with a real, mobile-friendly UI my non-technical wife could actually use from her phone. I couldn’t find it, so I built it for my own household and open-sourced it. Not claiming to reinvent anything (there’s a new “AI agents platform” every other week right now), I just took the UI-first angle.

Self-hosting fundamentals:

The parts I focused on (where having a UI actually pays off):

Install:

docker run -d -p 3000:3000 -v hivekeep:/app/data ghcr.io/marlburrow/hivekeep:latest

Open the web UI and the setup agent takes it from there.

GitHub: github.com/MarlBurroW/hivekeep Site + demo: hivekeep.app

It’s young and I’m after honest feedback. Disclosure: I’m the author, happy to answer anything.

#selfhosted

threaded - newest

mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com on 20 Jun 12:35 next collapse

This looks interesting, especially the persistent memory. I want to try it out but it seems likely to me that multiple simultaneous agents would require significant hardware. Even if they were serially activated, reloading contexts with each switch would take time. I have a pretty beefy GPU and experience significant (almost ridiculous) slowdown when opencode runs 2 subagents simultaneously.

But perhaps the memory storage/lookup keeps contexts very small?

Anyway, I can’t find any mention in the repo or docs what the suggested minimum hardware is.

irmadlad@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 14:55 next collapse

Anyway, I can’t find any mention in the repo or docs what the suggested minimum hardware is.

Same.

MarlburroW@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 18:35 collapse

Good question, and you’re right that it’s missing from the docs (just added a Hardware requirements section to the README to fix that).

The key thing: Hivekeep doesn’t run the models itself. It calls your provider (Anthropic/OpenAI/etc.) or a local OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so the heavy compute lives there, not in the app. The platform itself is a single Bun process over SQLite, no GPU, no extra services. It runs in well under 1 GB of RAM on a small home server.

On the multi-agent worry: agents are activated serially per message, not all firing at once, and the persistent memory is exactly what keeps each context small (hybrid vector + keyword recall, re-ranked, instead of replaying the whole history). So adding agents mostly means more calls routed to your provider, not multiplied local load.

The opencode slowdown you saw is on the inference side: if you point Hivekeep at local models (llama.cpp / LM Studio / Ollama / vLLM), the hardware question moves to your inference server, same as any other client. If you use a hosted provider, your machine barely feels it.

nexttech@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 19:58 collapse

This sounds like chatgpt

0807@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 14:41 next collapse

Another AI slop…

warmaster@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 15:13 next collapse

Holy shit, this looks amazing. Is there a way to add personal assistant features and UI elements like the ones found on Odysseus for example?

MarlburroW@lemmy.world on 20 Jun 18:35 collapse

I won’t argue with the downvotes, honestly they’re fair and I get it. This is an AI project posted to a community that’s rightly tired of AI slop, and I’d be skeptical too.

So let me be straight: yes, I used Claude heavily to build this. I’m a solo dev and it’s how I got it done at all. But every decision (architecture, stack, features, scope) is mine. That doesn’t mean they’re good decisions, just that they’re deliberate, not generated. I built this because it actually solves a need I had at home, and I figured I’d share it in case it’s useful to someone else, not to pretend I’m reinventing anything.

I also added an honest “How this is built” note to the README and the site rather than hide the AI use. If the code reads like unreviewed slop anywhere, that’s a real bug to me and I’ll fix it.

Either way, I hear the reception loud and clear, and I appreciate the people who took the time to actually tell me why.