Used NetApp 6TB SAS for 38€???
from peregus@lemmy.world to selfhosted@lemmy.world on 19 Apr 10:39
https://lemmy.world/post/14462585

I’ve found these NetApp SAS Festplatte 6TB 7,2k SAS 12G 3,5" - 111-02374 E-X4064A-R6 ST6000NM0034, that cost only 38€! It’s a brand that I’ve never heard about and I’ve no idea how many hours they’ve worked (I’ve asked and I’m waiting for an answer). What do you think?

Edit: I’ve asked the seller if there is a custom firmware that makes the drive unusable and it answered me saying that they work with any SAS HBA controller. They have worked 1863h and written 130TB (he showed me 4 screenshots of 4 tests of 4 drives)

#selfhosted

threaded - newest

tagginator@utter.online on 19 Apr 10:40 next collapse

New Lemmy Post: Used NetApp 6TB SAS for 38€??? (https://lemmyverse.link/lemmy.world/post/14462585)
Tagging: #SelfHosted

(Replying in the OP of this thread (NOT THIS BOT!) will appear as a comment in the lemmy discussion.)

I am a FOSS bot. Check my README: https://github.com/db0/lemmy-tagginator/blob/main/README.md

BOFH666@lemmy.world on 19 Apr 11:23 next collapse

NetApp makes storage devices, just like Dell’s DataDomain.

Looks like the ad is referring to a ST6000NM0034, a drive from Seagate. Personally, I like to stay away from that brand as far as possible.

Have had good experiences with WD.

Deckweiss@lemmy.world on 19 Apr 15:27 collapse

It’s funny how it is the exact opposite for me.

All my WD drives died, while all my Seagate drives are in perfect working order.

Bought 2 WD hdds new, used them for about 4 years in RAID for daily borg backups, one died, the other got very slow with tons of smart errors.

Bought 2 Seagate hdds new, same usecase, same capacity, have been running for over 5 years now.

Personal anecdotes are not a reliable factor for manufacturer quality.

To quote some statistics:

In general, Seagate drives are less expensive and their failure rates are typically higher in our environment. But, their failure rates are typically not high enough to make them less cost effective over their lifetime.

Source: backblaze.com/…/backblaze-drive-stats-for-2022/

Moonrise2473@feddit.it on 19 Apr 12:48 next collapse

For what I saw there’s a good chance it has a custom firmware that makes them unusable outside the walled garden

peregus@lemmy.world on 19 Apr 13:17 collapse

Mmm…interesting, how did you arrive to that thought?

Edit1: in the meanwhile I’ve asked the seller if they have a custom firmware. They have already answered me with 4 test of 4 drives that reports 1863h of work and about 130TB written

Edit2: the seller has answered me saying that they work with any SAS HBA controller

chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net on 19 Apr 16:39 next collapse

NetApp is big in enterprise DAS space; think big server rack with highly redundant components to provide block storage devices to multiple workstations in the office. If I remember correctly, they’re also the ones where their drives are formatted with 520 bytes per sector, and you’d need to reformat them using sg_format to 512 bytes per sector before you can use them with some systems.

peregus@lemmy.world on 19 Apr 16:50 collapse

Reading around I’ve notice that there could be this risk and I’ve ask the seller if they’re 520 or 512.

antsu@lemmy.wtf on 21 Apr 02:35 collapse

I have a bunch of ST6000NM0095 (which are similar specs) in my NAS, and despite already being well used when I got them, so far only one needed to be replaced in nearly 5 years of (my) usage.

My only advice with these is: if you notice a maddening noise coming from them when they’re idle, update them to the latest firmware and it’ll go away.

peregus@lemmy.world on 21 Apr 05:40 collapse

Hi Antsu, thanks for your precious feedback!