's can be short for is, or am I wrong? just like “that’s” is a contraction for “that is”.
I am not a native english speaker, so i might be wrong though.
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
on 24 Oct 10:52
nextcollapse
It depends on whether there is only one or more jedis on board. “Little Jedi’s on board” is singular, while “Little Jedis on board” is plural. I have a suspicion that it was meant to be plural, as in they had multiple kids in the car. But of course it is impossible to say.
threaded - newest
He upset about the apostrophe, the S, or the younglings?
Probably just the younglings, but yes that sticker is an abomination before the lord.
Yeah, I get the feeling the apostrophe wasn’t meant to be there. And if it was, then it wasn’t along with the S.
Also, hail the Empire. Need to kill that fanatical driver and return the child back to their family.
Yes
what’s wrong with the apostrophe?
“Little Jedi is on board” sounds reasonably right to me.
Jedi isn’t a contraction. So, what’s an on board, and why does Little Jedi possess it?
's can be short for is, or am I wrong? just like “that’s” is a contraction for “that is”.
I am not a native english speaker, so i might be wrong though.
You are correct.
It depends on whether there is only one or more jedis on board. “Little Jedi’s on board” is singular, while “Little Jedis on board” is plural. I have a suspicion that it was meant to be plural, as in they had multiple kids in the car. But of course it is impossible to say.
But the plural of Jedi is Jedi.
Jedi’re
It’s their own fault. Who divulges the whereabouts of jedi in this day and age?
little jedi’s what is on board?
Ferreal. The apostrophe alone is grounds for a flip.